

So why in the crap am I getting updates for software that either not installed or activated. Just want to get some of this more clear to me as I might install on Main pc also. Is it a Microsoft thing, where they are trying to secure the market as usual? I think so from what I have read. This was something I needed and could not obtain it any other way. I wish I had kept better notes but was running as fast as I could to test many different pathways. I might have even Uninstalled Pipelight then reinstalled. Don't know if the commands even worked or were needed I will have to check that out soon. And, this intern will break the package upon launch, so I ran the Apparmor commands to Whitelist Silverlight? or Pipelight? not sure, reinstalled Pipelight and it worked . The Pipelight thread said that having Apparmor running will not allow Firefox to run third party software by default. You see, it installed at some point, but then, when I went to my ehub, it failed. Did you have to Tweak Apprmor to allow it to run?Ī) Opps, you probably were not able to test it like I did. You installed Pipelight in Firefox right?īecause from what I have read it is not that easy in Chrome.Ģ.

That led me to the answer to get past that agreement.ġ. Was lucky enough to have Kaosu also, way back in July, she pointed me to the Pipelight site but I had forgotten about it. Learning every day cat1092, thanks for getting me started. It's not running 24/7 if that's what you want to know.Īs a bonus, Pipelight is also needed to view movie content from some sites (such as Netflix, among others).Įdited by cat1092, 17 June 2015 - 12:36 AM. Though if it's tried in the Software Manager, it may or may not go through, that's why I use the Package Manager, it's much more efficient.Īs to using it on Firefox, it's only in use when viewing content that requires the plug in, by default it's set to select to 'Ask to Activate' any when desired/needed (open Firefox > Add-ons > Plugins & it'll be seen). One reason why initial installs should be planned out, for future needs, as well as those the day of install. ttf-mscorefonts-installer has been a given for me for the last couple of years & it's much simpler to install than in the past. These extra fonts are handy to have & having these already installed prevents roadblocks like you ran into from being there to begin with. No issues whatsoever, however that's because I always add the fonts that the 'ttf-mscorefonts-installer' provides. It's among the things I install when I setup a new Linux Mint OS, so that snag, some won't run into & I had no idea this was a prerequisite to install Pipelight, as I just in the midst of typing this post installed it using the commands I provided in the first post. Though I already had the 'ttf-mscorefonts-installer' added, it's in the Package Manager.
